|
The Relation to Goguryeo
In 400, King Gwanggaeto of Goguryeo sent 50,000 troops
to the south to the request of Silla. The purpose of the
war was to drive out Gaya and Wae, which invaded the royal
capital of Silla, but another purpose was to restrain the
rear of Baekje which was a long enemy of Goguryeo. Hence,
Goguryeo combined with Silla, and Baekje with Gaya and Wae
in this war.
At this moment, the leading force of the Gaya region was
the Gaya force in Gimhae. It is since the end of this war
that Daegaya in Goryeong became completely distinguished.
Some argue that Daegaya became a central force among several
Gaya states since Daegaya suffered light damage from the
war in 400. However, this argument has no clear ground.
It is believed that Daegaya first had a relation to Goguryeo
in 400 when the Goguryeo army attacked. At that time, Daegaya
participated in the war as an allied army of Baekje because
Daegaya had an intimate relation to Baekje. However, Daegaya
and Goguryeo were not related to the war as a direct party
of war or negotiation.
It is in the late fifth century that Daegaya had a direct
relation to Goguryeo. In the early fifth century, the Goguryeo
army conquered the south region of the Korean peninsula.
After the mid-fifth century, the amicable relations between
Silla and Goguryeo began to crumble. In 450, a military
clash happened between these two states.
From 455, Silla and Baekje assumed a common defensive posture
against Gogoryeo. For example, when Goguryeo invaded Baekje,
Silla dispatched rescue forces to Baekje. Such a situation
kept up until the late fifth century. At that time, Daegaya
stood in the side of Baekje and Silla. The mutual assistance
system among Baekje, Silla and Daegaya against Goguryeo
in the north was formed.
Under such a situation the movable width of Daegaya came
to become wide. This is identified by the following facts.
In 479, Daegaya offered tributes to Namje and in 481 Daegaya
along with Baekje dispatched rescue forces to Silla so as
to defeat Goguryeo and Malgal. At that time, Daegaya also
tried to establish relations with Goguryeo.
This fact is obvious by Ilbonseogi (Chronicle of Japan).
However, the approach of Daegaya to Goguryeo called forth
the reaction of Baekje, and hence Daegaya provided Baekje
with a pretext to rebouch to the Gaya region.
The Relation to Baekje
Since the mid-fourth century, Daegaya and Baekje kept a
friendly relation. For Daegaya, Baekje was a pathway to
adopt advanced civilizations. In 481 when Goguryeo and Malgal
invaded Silla, Daegaya along with Baekje sent rescue forces
to Silla.
As can be seen from this fact, Daegaya and Baekje had an
amicable relation until this time. Such a relation was broken
around 487 because of an incident when Daegaya attempted
to form a relation with Goguryeo.
A more fundamental reason, however, was the debouchment
of Baekje to the Gaya region ¡ª especially, the southwest
region of Gaya. In the early sixth century Baekje rearranged
the relation to Tamla (nowadays, the Jeju island) and debouched
to the Seomjingang valley, focusing its own attention on
the Jeolla-do region.
Such an attempt of Baekje made Daegaya anxious. Accordingly,
Daegaya built castles from place to place to defend itself
and took a strong posture against Baekje. Also, Daegaya
opposed to Baekje by forming a marriage alliance with Silla.
In 531, Baekje debouched to Allaguk in Haman which was
another central force among several Gaya states at that
time. This is because Baekje could not look on idly the
debouchment of Silla to the Gaya region. In those days,
Daegaya was in a situation which lost its ability to lead
the whole Gaya region.
Rather Allaguk in Haman took the leadership and controlled
the diplomatic affairs of Gaya. Such a circumstance continued
until the 530s.
The situation in the 540s is described in detail in Heummyeonggi
of Ilbonseogi (Chronicle of Japan). In 541, the representatives
of several states whose leaders were Daegaya and Allaguk
held a meeting with King Seong of Baekje in order to reconstruct
the Gaya states already conquered by Silla.
Scholars call this meeting as ¡°the Sabi Meeting¡± because
it was held in Sabi (nowadays, Buyeo). King Seong led the
meeting, but Baekje and Gaya states had different purposes.
Baekje did not sincerely hope the restoration of Gaya. This
is shown by fact that Baekje sent envoys to Silla before
the meeting.
Such antinomic behaviour of Baekje happened because it
was conscious of Goguryeo¡¯s presence in the north. Baekje
needed to keep a friendly relation or an allied relation
to Silla in order to fight Goguryeo in the future. Therefore,
Baekje was unable to actively curb the debouchment of Silla
to the Gaya region.
Such a reality is proven by the statement of King Seong.
Mentioning an old affair, he simply emphasized the justification
of the meeting and did not suggest concrete alternatives
for the recovery of the Gaya states destructed by Silla.
Those Gaya states, which attended the meeting, became aware
of such an intention of Baekje, and thus devised a trick.
They were anxious about the fact that the alliance with
Baekje may be not able to guarantee their security.
In 544, Baekje therefore held the Second Sabi Meeting.
King Seong of Baekje pointed out the justification of the
meeting once more and proposed three tricks.
However, they was a passive alternative that Gaya and Wae
carry out the war and Baekje supplies only the goods for
the war. At the same time, King Seong underlined the necessity
of Baekje¡¯s stationing in the Gaya region and claimed the
banishment of those pro-Silla people who were active in
Allaguk.
Those people, who attended the meeting, withdrew from it,
saying that they would discuss the issue with the kings
of Alla and Deagaya.
The fate of the Gaya states was to play a role as a buffer
between Baejke and Silla. However, in the 550s such a situation
came to change. In 551, Silla and Baekje attacked and deprived
the Hangang valley which was being occupied by Goguryeo.
In those days, Goguryeo could not afford to pay attention
to the Hangang valley because of its inner conflict between
nobles and the preparation to Dolgwol, a newly rising nomadic
force in the north. Two years later, Silla betrayed Baekje,
its allied state, and deprived the downstream region of
the Hangang which was being occupied by Baekje.
Baekje could not bear such action from Silla. Baekje could
never give up the downstream region of the Hangang because
this region was not only a strategically and economically
important place, but was the cradle of the state. In 554,
Baekje mobilized troops and attacked Silla.
Daegaya participated in the war as an allied army of Baekje,
but Baekje was seriously defeated. King Seong was dead in
the Gwansanseong (nowadays, Okchoen in Chungcheongbuk-do)
battle and thousands of soldiers were annihilated.
Since 554, Baekje could not excise its influence over the
Gaya region any longer. Hence, Daegaya, which participated
in the war as an allied army, was incorporated into Silla.
In 555, Silla established Haju (nowadays, Changryeong),
a military strongpoint. In 561, King Jinheung visited here
and held a meeting in order to debouch to the west region
of the Nakdonggang, including Daegaya. In 562, Daegaya was
at last conquered by the Silla army led by General Yisabu.
The Relation to Silla
In the stage of a small state, there is no data about the
relation between Daegaya and Silla. It is around the late
fifth century when the direct relations between the two
states began to appear in a historical record.
There is an article that Gaya sent a white pheasant to
Silla in Ilbonseogi (Historical Record of the Three Kingdoms).
There is a high possibility that Gaya, in the article, may
be Daegaya. Such action of Gaya seems to be an attempt that
several Gaya states, whose leading force is Daegaya, linked
them to Silla.
In 522, Daegaya sent envoys to Silla and accomplished the
marriage between the two royal families. There was a military
demonstration of Silla in the Changryeong region in 561.
In the next year (in 562), Daegaya was collapsed by the
assault of the Silla army led by General Yisabu.
Daegaya enjoyed its heyday from the mid-fifth century to
the early sixth century, but fell due to its lack of power
and diplomatic isolation among neighboring strong states.
|